Rittgers & Rittgers, Attorneys at Law
Get Your Consultation Today
513-932-2115

How Neuroscience May Impact Your Case

brainscan.jpgNeuroscience - the study of the nervous system - has recently emerged as a source of evidence in the U.S. court system. Neuroscientific evidence is most often used in criminal defense, where attorneys use evidence as a factor for why their clients behaved a certain way.

While neuroscience usually will not excuse a defendant's culpability for committing a crime, it can be offered as proof for leniency in sentencing - especially in situations where capital punishment or life sentences are pursued by the prosecution. Although rarely used in civil cases at this time, neuroscience may also be relevant in lawsuits.

Let's explore two examples where neuroscience has or could be used in the courtroom.

Imagine that a young mother has been charged with child endangerment and neglect of her children. Her defense attorney presents evidence that the mother was previously in a car accident that caused her serious brain damage and her IQ is now in the 60s. This neuroscientific data may not prove that the woman is fit to retain custody of her children, but it certainly could help defend against allegations of abuse and neglect - depending on the factual circumstances of the case.

Imagine that a man has been charged with murdering three people. The prosecution paints the accused as a cold and remorseless monster who should receive the death sentence. His defense attorney then presents images showing a tumor on the defendant's brain. The lawyer then calls a doctor to the stand, who testifies that the tumor likely hinders the defendant's ability to feel empathy and remorse. While the evidence will probably not result in an acquittal, it may save the accused from capital punishment.

Because neuroscience is a relevant and increasingly reliable piece of evidence, its courtroom presence will continue to grow in coming years. Take a look at how far it has come in a short period of time:

  • The number of judicial opinions citing neuroscience doubled between 2007 and 2012.
  • During 2012, approximately 25 percent of trials seeking capital punishment involved neuroscientific evidence.

Courts are cautious about admitting neuroscience into evidence; they fear that the evidence could be manipulated to explain away culpability for wrongful acts. Also, courts and judges are uncomfortable with new types of evidence they haven't previously dealt with. No matter the relevance, it may take a resourceful and experienced lawyer to uncover and use neuroscientific evidence on behalf of his or her defendant.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  1. Distinguished AV | LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability
  2. Super Lawyers
  3. AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb
  4. Super Lawyers Rising Stars
  5. Million Dollar Advocates Forum
  6. Multi Million Dollar Advocates Forum
  7. The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  8. The National Trial Lawyers | Top 40 Under 40

Get Your Consultation Today. Call 513-932-2115.

Rittgers & Rittgers answers its phones 24/7. Call us anytime to secure your consultation with one of our award-winning lawyers. You can rely on us for elite representation from our deliberately small, family-run law firm.

Lebanon Office
12 East Warren Street
Lebanon, Ohio 45036

Phone: 513-932-2115
Fax: 513-934-2201
Lebanon Law Office

Cincinnati Office
312 Walnut St., Suite 1600
Cincinnati, OH 45202

Phone: 513-932-7375
Walnut Street Law Office

Oxford Office
121 West High Street
Oxford, OH 45056

Phone: 513-524-5000
Oxford Law Office Map

Email Us Today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Email Us Today